Follow YHS on TwitterMy Tweets
Upcoming Deadlines from YHS Calendar
No upcoming events
- AGU FM 2013
- AGU FM 2014
- EGU GA 2013
- EGU GA 2014
- EGU GA 2015
- EGU GA 2016
- EGU GA 2017
- EGU GA 2018
- Fall Meeting
- Getting involved
- Hallway Conversations
- Joint Assembly 2015
- Meet the Expert
- National branch
- online survey
- Research Hylights
- Short Course
- Streams of Thought
- student representative
- team member
- YHS Event
- YHS NL
- YHS Session
- Young Hydrologic Society
- EGU Early Career Scientist Rep for Hydrological Sciences (2019-2021): applications open February 1, 2019
- STAHY 2019 January 24, 2019
- Hydrology + Vienna = EGU 2019 November 27, 2018
- Broader Impacts Can Bring Hydrological Processes to Life July 29, 2018
- YHS Collection on “Unexpected Results in Hydrology” July 24, 2018
by Svenja Fischer
The tenth edition of the STAHY International Workshop, STAHY 2019, is organized by the International Commission on Statistical Hydrology (ICSH) of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS), in cooperation with the Hohai University. It will be held in Nanjing, China betweeb 19-20 October 2019 at the College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University. The potential participants could submit 1-page abstract through the IAHS-Copernicus Abstract Management System (will open soon).
STAHY 2019, similarly to previous editions (STAHY 2018 in Adelaide, South Australia & STAHY 2017 in Warsaw, Poland), will focus on statistical methods for hydrological applications. The topics range from big data to extremes and climate change but also prediction and uncertainty. This diversity makes this conference so interesting. I participated in this conference twice and I can highly recommend the participation.
Due to the small community with about 100 people, the conference is very familiar and one gets in touch with the other researchers easily. It has been a great opportunity for me as an early career scientist to talk to experts about my research. On the day before this workshop (Oct 18, 2019), also an Early Career Course will be held as well as a short reception for the early career members. Further information can be found at: http://www.stahy2019.org.
I hope to see many of you at the STAHY 2019!
About the author:
Svenja Fischer (Svenja.firstname.lastname@example.org) is a Post-Doc at the Ruhr-University Bochum working on flood statistics and Early Career Committee Representative for the IAHS (@IAHS_AISH) International Commission on Statistical Hydrology.
EGU 2019 – Call for ABSTRACTS
Abstract submission deadline: Jan 10, 2019 (13:00, CET)
Financial support application deadline: Dec 1, 2018
As we are getting closer to say goodbye to 2018, the next European Geosciences Union General Assembly is seen on the horizon. Since 2005, Vienna has been the most popular destination during lovely spring time for many hydrologists all over Europe (and all around the world, one can say looking at the statistics from EGU 2018). There is no doubt that the EGU GA 2019 (7–12 April 2019) will be no exception considering the highly rich programme of the Hydrological Sciences (HS) Division (>120 HS-led sessions) for EGU 2019! The sessions can be browsed by selecting “Hydrological Sciences” in the programme groups. You can submit abstracts until the deadline 10 January 2019, Monday (13:00 CET). The call for abstracts can be read here.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by John Van Stan & Jan Friesen.
Writing my first full science proposal in a new tenure-track position was challenging but, honestly, most sections flowed smoothly from my fingertips. The motivation, background, research approach, hypotheses, methods, and even project and data management plans fit snuggly together beneath the overarching question: Will forests interact differently with rainfall along a natural-to-urban continuum? Then, confidently, I wrote “Broader Impacts” in bold, sipped my single-origin third-wave coffee, and stared blankly at the blinking text cursor. Every other blink interrupted my stream-of-thought until, after mere minutes, the cursor had elevated itself from nuisance to arch-nemesis. It became clear that each blink was a taunt as it shed its disguising vowel for a more rancorous one, becoming the villainous “Curser.” Unluckily, I knew this villain all too well. I also knew that I had to act fast, before the Curser’s mocking winks dissolved my thoughts to mush! With astonishing rapidity, my fingers fluttered out several sentences, forcing the Curser to retreat down the page. There it sat, one line below my newest paragraph, derisively staring at this anemic assembly of platitudinous promises. Like a bot trained by reading innumerable “Broader Impacts” sections, I had spewed out some vanilla text pudding that blandly promised to “present and publish findings,” “integrate work into my courses,” “extend current scientific theory,” and so on …list abbreviated as to not bore the reader any more than was necessary. I locked an unflinchingly open stare with the Curser’s unflinchingly blinking slash. It was clear: The battle for unique broader impacts had begun! Continue reading
by Caitlyn A. Hall, Andrea Popp, Hannes Müller, and Tim van Emmerik
Understanding and learning from unexpected results is a fundamental element of science. Different names exist for these results, e.g., failures, obstacles, or unexpected results. Although all of these names sound unexpected, they are important for the understanding of processes, developing and testing of theories, and identifying pitfalls and possible dead-ends in science.
By carefully designing and conducting experiments with some level of trial-and-error, researchers eventually find results that will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Paradoxically, we typically only publish the successful tests and their results. What comes of the weeks to months of critical information that led to this successful experiment? It usually remains in the dark. However, not sharing unsuccessful iterations or unexpected results — defined here as experiments that do not adequately confirm an accepted hypothesis, despite sound and careful experimental design, planning, and execution — along the way prevents others to learn from these endeavors (Nature Editorial, 2017).
In the past, many philosophers, including Popper (1963) and Chalmers (1973), have emphasized that science can only advance by learning from mistakes. Moreover, recent literature in various fields elaborate on the many benefits and values of publishing unexpected results and call upon the scientific community to nurture their dissemination (e.g., Andréassian, et al., 2010; Schooler, 2011; Matosin et al., 2014; Granqvist, 2015; Goodchild van Hinten, 2015; Boorman, et al., 2015; PLOS collections; 2015, 2017; Nature Editorial, 2017). Despite the various calls to report such results and the frequency they occur in the labspace, they are still underrepresented in most fields of our current publication system. The reasons can be manifold such as, a lack of incentive (no scientific reward) or the fear of a negative reputational impact.
So, why should you report your failed approaches and unexpected findings?
By reporting on unexpected findings, we can do the following:
- Decrease the currently existing publication bias towards positive results
- Save time and resources of other scientists exploring same/similar hypotheses and/or approaches
- Increase transparency and reproducibility of our studies
- Share all findings of publicly funded projects
How and where can you share your unexpected findings?
You can share your unexpected results at:
- Special journal issues
- Dedicated sessions at conferences
- Platforms (e.g., Researchgate)
- Supplementary material of your paper
- Blog posts
We aim to stimulate this discussion via the new Young Hydrologic Society collection “Unexpected Results in Hydrology”. We want to instill a positive perception to change the way in which the scientific hydrologic community value unexpected and negative results including individual researchers, scientific societies, funding agencies, and publishers. Therefore, we invite researchers to report their negative and unexpected results, such that we are able to holistically advance science – by sharing our failures, not only our successes.
Reporting on such findings should include the following components in a maximum of 3,000 words: 1) an original research objective and expected results, 2) a brief summary of experimental design and methods, 3) discussion on the experimental results and challenges, including images and/or figures, and possibly 4) lessons learned and the path forward.
After a peer-review done by the editors of this collection, the post will get a DOI and will be visible on the YHS website and on a dedicated ResearchGate project site. On ResearchGate we invite discussions on published submissions such that the authors can receive feedback to facilitate new insights from the scientific community. Upon enhancing their previous analysis or coming to new conclusions, we welcome resubmissions by the original authors.
Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Parent, E. and Bárdossy, A. (2010). Editorial – The Court of Miracles of Hydrology: can failure stories contribute to hydrological science? Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(6), 849–856.
Boorman, G.A., Foster, J.R., Laast, V.A. and Francke, S. (2015). Regulatory Forum Opinion Piece: The Value of Publishing Negative Scientific Study Data, Toxicol Pathol, 43(7), 901-906. doi: 10.1177/0192623315595884
Chalmers, A.F. (1973). On Learning from Our Mistakes, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Oxford University Press) 24(2), 164-173.
Goodchild van Hilten, L. (2015).Why it’s time to publish research “failures”-Publishing bias favors positive results; now there’s a movement to change that. Elsevier Connect.
Granqvist, E. (2015). Why science needs to publish negative results. Elsevier Connect
Matosin, N., E. Frank , M. Engel, J.S. Lum, and Newell, K.A. (2014). Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture. Disease Models and Mechanisms. 7(2): 171–173. doi: 10.1242/dmm.015123
Nature Editorial (2017). Nurture negatives, Nature 551, 414, doi: 10.1038/d41586-017-07325-2
PLOS Collections (2015). Positively Negative: A New PLOS ONE Collection focusing on Negative, Null and Inconclusive Results, PLOS ONE Community Blog
PLOS Collections (2017). Negative Results: A Crucial Piece of the Scientific Puzzle, PLOS ONE Community Blog
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge Classics, London and New York
Schooler, J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect, Nature 470, 437, doi:10.1038/470437a
Early Career scientists make up a significant amount of our community, creating an opportunity to include a new generation of hydrologists as active contributors to IAHS. Early Career scientist involvement in geoscientific organizations has rapidly increased over recent years. Organizations such as the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the European Geosciences Union (EGU) have adopted Early Career representation in committees, board and executive committees.
During its Bureau Meeting in July 2017 (held in Port Elizabeth, South Africa following the IAHS Scientific Assembly 2017), IAHS decided to strengthen its Early Career scientist representation to enable more active participation of those members within IAHS Commissions and Working Groups. To achieve this goal, in line with the proposal submitted by Tim van Emmerik and Nilay Dogulu—and approved by the Bureau members—IAHS will establish an Early Career Committee (ECC) consisting of the Early Career Representative of each IAHS Commission plus a chair and co-chair. The IAHS definition of Early Career embraces scientists up to 5 years after completion of the PhD (allowing for an extra year per child for parents if they took parental leave).
The ECC is aimed at representing the Early Career membership of the IAHS at the highest level, and within each Commission. ECC members are dedicated to fostering dialogue between Early Career members, and between current and future generations of hydrologists. The ECC chair will be appointed by the IAHS Bureau and will join the IAHS Bureau meetings as an observer. The chair will be encouraged to also be an active member of the Young Hydrologic Society to assure strong connections with other Early Career initiatives in the hydrological community.
Towards Regional Information to Improve Our Understanding on Weather, Water, and Climate Extreme Events
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Caroline Aubry-Wake, Gaby Langendijk, Marisol Osman, Carla Gulizia.
On May 3-5, 40 early careers researchers from 23 different countries grouped together for an in-depth interdisciplinary discussion on generating regional information to improve our understanding of weather, water and climate extreme events. This workshop, organized jointly by the Young Earth System Scientist (YESS) and the Young Hydrologic Society (YHS), took place prior to the 2018 GEWEX Open Science Conference (OSC). The goal of the workshop was to develop a shared ECR vision on challenges and ways forward to enhance the generation of usable regional information for water, weather and climate extremes, and the utility of that information for users, decision makers and other stakeholders. During the three days, the discussions centered on three topics: data sources (conventional and unconventional), scale-interactions and user needs.
The following points summarize some tips that were provided during the short course ‘How to write (and publish) a scientific paper in Hydrology’ held at the 2018 EGU General Assembly in Vienna. The tips are based on the input from the expert panel consisting of Hannah Cloke (University of Reading), Giuliano Di Baldassarre (Uppsala University), Ciaran Harman (Johns Hopkins University) and Margaret Shanafield (Flinders University).
At the EGU General Assembly 2018 in Vienna, “Hydroinformatics for hydrology” short course (SC) was run for the fourth time. The previous themes of the SC were data-driven and hybrid techniques, data assimilation, and geostatistical modelling. And this year the focus was extreme value modelling. Participants of the SC were given a state-of-the-science overview of different aspects in extreme value analysis along with relevant case studies. Available R functions for extreme value analysis were also introduced. Thanks to Hugo’s excellent lecture, we now know common issues and pitfalls in using extreme value models (i.e. modelling choices and assumptions). We would like to thank Dr. Hugo Winter from EDF Energy for delivering the lecture. You can find his lecture slides (and exercises) here:
@hugocwinter giving an excellent lecture on extreme value modelling as part of the #EGU18 @YoungHydrology short course “Hydroinformatics for Hydrology”. We are in room -2.85 (brown level)! pic.twitter.com/viO3430tSs
— Nilay Dogulu (@DoguluNilay) April 9, 2018
Research “Hylight”: Social and structural patterns of drought-related water conservation and rebound by Gonzales & Ajami (2017)
By Natasha Krell
In December 2017, Patricia Gonzalez and her colleagues published a paper on a novel water demand system dynamics model that integrates social and structural drivers of water conservation in WRR. We asked her a couple of questions.
Less than three weeks left for the EGU General Assembly 2018 (EGU 2018, 8 – 13 April), we are delighted to announce the events and activities (co-)organized by YHS! Don’t forget to put them in your personal conference schedule 🙂
Links to sessions
- Hydroinformatics for Hydrology: extreme value modelling – Mon, 09 Apr, 13:30–15:00 / Room -2.85
- Invited Lecturer: Hugo Winter (EDF Energy, PhD in Statistics and Operational Research at Lancaster University: STOR-i)
- Meet the Expert in Hydrology: Bridging the gap between hydrological science and practice – Tue, 10 Apr, 12:15–13:15 / Room -2.91
- Jutta Thielen (Head of the Scientific Development Unit at EC JRC) and Johannes Cullmann (Director of the Climate and Water Department at WMO)
- Rhyme Your Research – Tue, 10 Apr, 10:30–12:00 / Room -2.16
- Using R in Hydrology – Wed, 11 Apr, 10:30–12:00 / Room -2.16
- Innovation in Geoscience, Hydrology and Engineering Education – Orals / (Wed, 11 Apr, 08:30–10:00 / Room -2.85); Posters (Wed, 11 Apr, 13:30–15:00 / Hall X1)
- How to write (and publish) a scientific paper in hydrology – Fri, 13 Apr, 08:30–10:00 / Room -2.16
- Invited Speakers: Hannah Cloke (University of Reading, GB), Ciaran Harman (Johns Hopkins, USA), Giuliano Di Baldassarre (Uppsala University, Sweden), Margaret Shanafield (Flinders, Australia)
- Future of (hydrological) publishing – Fri, 13 Apr, 13:30–15:00 / PICO spot A
- Solicited contribution by Doerthe Tetzlaff
You are kindly invited to joins us in these short courses, PICOs, etc. If you have any questions about specific sessions / events, don’t hesitate to contact YHS or the conveners.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Nilay Dogulu.Dr. Johannes Cullmann is a hydrologist, currently acting as the Director of the Climate and Water Department (CLW) at the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). His scientific background is flood forecasting, and has vast working experience in hydrology practice in the international context. Johannes Cullmann is also the Head of the CLW’s Hydrology and Water Resources (HWR) Branch where I worked as a consultant last summer. I had the pleasure to interview him briefly in his office at the WMO Secretariat (Geneva, Switzerland) despite his tight schedule and being often on missions.
Join us and @YESSCommunity in Canada May 2018 for the ECR workshop: ‘Towards Regional Information to Improve Our Understanding on Weather, Water and Climate Extreme Events’ prior to @GEWEX_WCRP Conference: EXTREMES AND WATER ON THE EDGE! See website for more details on how to apply and for availability of (limited) travel funding etc. here.
DEADLINE: 18th December
A “Streams of Thought” contribution by Andrea Popp.
A scientific poster is a communication tool explaining your work and encouraging conversation with colleagues. However, making a good poster is not easy. The following list provides ten guidelines for an awesome poster to help you to communicate your work more efficiently. You also find insider tips from recent EGU and AGU Outstanding Student Poster Award winners (Skuyler Herzog, Ingo Heidbüchel, and Michael Stölzle) and some great advice from the EGU Hydrology OSPP coordinators Luisa Hopp and Julian Klaus.
This month is all about the EGU elections. Until November 30, you as EGU member can vote for important functions, such as the EGU President and EGU Division Presidents. During these elections we can also vote for our new EGU Hydrology Division President. We decided to conduct a short interview with the two candidates: Thom Bogaard and Maria-Helena Ramos.
Our voting advise: Go Vote!
Check our email for your voting ballot.
EGU 2018 – Call for Abstracts
Abstract submission deadline: Jan 10, 2018
Financial support application deadline: Dec 1, 2017
The next European Geosciences Union General Assembly will take place between 8–13 April 2018 in Vienna, Austria. Don’t forget to submit your abstract to the conference by 10 January 2018.
The Young Hydrologic Society has evolved within the last five years into an active platform for early career scientists to engage with the wider hydrological community. A variety of activities and events have helped the YHS in achieving its goals. Looking forward, we aim to build on these accomplishments and continue embracing new ideas and initiatives for connecting hydrologists all around the world. Below we shortly explain what we plan to do in the next five years of YHS:
Marius Floriancic & Shaun Harrigan
A core mission of the Young Hydrologic Society (YHS) is to better connect early-career hydrologists right from the beginning of their careers. To date this has been done by creating an online platform and organising events at major international conferences, such as the European Geosciences Union (EGU), American Geophysical Union (AGU), and International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) events. The society was started and is maintained by a small core group of people.
On October 18th, 2012 YHS launched this website. The first post announcing the existence of YHS only reached 38 people. Luckily, over time the visits to the website increased. By now, the website has over 50.000 page views by visitors from 162 countries. In the remainder of this post, we will highlight some of the most popular sections of the website.
Early career hydrologists can benefit from the advice of others who are more advanced in their careers. We have solicited short answers from established hydrologists to (one or more of) the following questions:
Q1. What book or paper has been most influential to your career and why?
Q2. If I could only work on one problem in hydrology it would be […], because […]
Q3. What is your golden tip for current early career scientists?
Q4. What (avoidable) mistakes did you make early in your career?
Q5. How can young scientists improve their writing or presentations?
We thank all hydrologists that have been so generous to share their knowledge and took the effort to respond. The advice here reflects a diversity of philosophies that have led to a wide variety of careers. All responses are listed below (in alphabetical order). Enjoy reading!
This week marks the fifth anniversary of the Young Hydrologic Society. To celebrate this occasion, we will have daily posts covering highlights of the past years, an outlook to the future, and several other surprises.
In our first post of the week, we keep it short and focus on the most important part: YOU! We thank everyone that has actively contributed and/or participated to YHS activities over the past years. Without your generous help and your enthusiasm, none of this would have been possible.
We had a lot of fun! We hope you did so too!
On to the next five years!
Wouter Berghuijs, Nilay Dogulu, Harsh Beria, Andrea Popp, Shaun Harrigan, Hannes Müller, Marius Floriancic, Tim van Emmerik.
Here’s a link to a paper that describes a bit of the history of YHS.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Nilay Dogulu.
Dr. Harry Lins is a hydrologist specialized in stochastic hydrology and hydroclimatology, and the current President of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Commission for Hydrology (CHy). He chaired the annual meeting of the Advisory and Management Committees for the Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM) (held from 4-5 September 2017 at WMO Secretariat in Geneva, Switzerland). Attending the same meeting as part of my (external) consultancy for the APFM Technical Support Unit, I took the opportunity to interview him. Harry Lins kindly accepted answering our questions during one of the lunch breaks in between his busy schedule full of meetings.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Nilay Dogulu.
Claudio Caponi is the Chief of the Division of Capacity Building in Hydrology and Water Resources – one of the three divisions under the WMO’s Climate and Water (CLW) Department, Hydrology and Water Resources (HWR) Branch. He has been working at WMO Secretariat in Geneva since January 1999. He has substantial experience in capacity building for hydrological services particularly in developing countries. I met Claudio Caponi for the first time during the Expert Forum on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) in a changing climate: Lessons learned on lessons learned back in early 2015. Furthermore, I had the pleasure to work with him this summer during my time at WMO as a consultant for the HWR Branch. I took this opportunity and interviewed him to understand about the hydrological practice in the world. He kindly answered our questions at the WMO Secretariat attic floor with the amazing view of the Lake of Geneva.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Andrea Popp.
Stefan Uhlenbrook is working for the United Nations (UN) as the Coordinator of the World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP) and is the Director of the Programme Office on Global Water Assessment in Perugia, Italy. Additionally, he holds a professorship for experimental hydrology at Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. Previously, he worked at UNESCO-IHE (Delft) as Professor of Hydrology as well as Vice-Rector and Director a.i. for Academic and Student Affairs. Stefan Uhlenbrook did his PhD and habilitation on investigating runoff generation processes at the University of Freiburg in Germany. I had the pleasure of meeting Dr. Uhlenbrook at this year’s EGU General Assembly in Vienna where I interviewed him about his work and also asked for some advice for young hydrologists.
Research “Hylight”: Hydrological response characteristics of Mediterranean catchments at different time scales: a meta-analysis by Merheb et al.
In January 2016, Mohammad Merheb and colleagues published a paper on comparative Mediterranean hydrology in Hydrological Sciences Journal. At the 2017 IAHS General Assembly, Mohammad was awarded the Tison award for this paper, and we decided to ask him a couple of questions.
Q: Let’s start with the basics. Where are you from, where are you based, and what are you working on now?
A: I am from a small village called El-Bireh located in Akkar district in the northern part of Lebanon. Now, I live and work in Tripoli, a port city in northern Lebanon where I am based at the Lebanese University. However, I must say that the article that won the Tison award was written when I was doing my PhD. I was based in Irstea, Montpellier, France and the L-CNRS, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nowadays, my main work is teaching. Nevertheless, I am still working on some research projects that I have started during my PhD. These are mostly related to catchment classification and regionalization studies.
In March, Rebecca Emerton and colleagues published a paper on ENSO-Driven Flood Hazard in Nature Communications. The paper found a more complex picture than is often assumed. We decided to ask Rebecca a few questions about the paper.
By Niels Claes
Less than 5 months to go until the AGU Fall Meeting in New Orleans starts and H3S are shifting into a higher gear with the preparation of following Fall Meeting activities:
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Tim van Emmerik & Nilay Dogulu.
From 10 to 14 July, 2017, the Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) took place in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. For the first time, YHS organized a series of events for Early Career Scientists (ECSs) on the African continent. By combining social and scientific elements, the program was aimed at connecting ECSs from all around the world to each other, and to more established scientists.
Three main events were organized: (1) Meet the Expert: “Predictions in ungauged basins under change”, (2) How to write a paper session, and (3) Early Career Community Building Discussion Session. Below we provide a short summary of all events.
For the first time at this year’s EGU 2017, HEPEX and the YHS jointly organised a Short course on Hydrological Forecasting. The course was focused on real-time hydrological forecasting and topics covered included:
- Estimating predictive uncertainty (e.g. ensembles & post-processing)
- Reducing predictive uncertainty (e.g. data assimilation)
- Forecast verification (graphical & numeric approaches)
- Risk-based decision making game for operational water management – it was fun!
This year’s HydroEco conference in Birmingham focussed on the growing importance of ecosystem services to hydrologic research. The conference successfully highlighted the diversity of this interdisciplinary field, with topics addressing relationships between hydrology, ecosystems and human interactions at different scales. For those interested in the diverse presentations held at HydroEco2017: check #Hydroeco17 on Twitter.
YHS organized a “Gallery walk” which aimed to discuss social issues and inequalities in academia. Poster prompts were hanging in the posters hall allowing each conference participant to share their opinions through writing. Here, we selected some interesting comments on the prompts. Thanks to everyone who participated with their inspiring contributions!
This year’s focus for “Hydroinformatics for hydrology” short course at EGU GA 2017 was geostatistics. Being introduced to the fundamentals of geostatistics, the participants (> 60, the room was full!) had the opportunity to hear about the applications of geostatistical methods in the hydrological domain using R. We would like to thank Prof. András Bárdossy (University of Stuttgart), Dr. Emmanouil Varouchakis (Technical University of Crete) and Dr. Gerald Corzo Perez (IHE Delft Institute for Water Education). You can find the lecture slides here:
An Introduction to Geostatistics (by András Bárdossy)
Geostatistics in R (by Emmanouil Varouchakis) – will be available here soon, check this post later this month!
Repost from HEPEX blog
Contributed by Florian Pappenberger and Maria-Helena Ramos (both considerably beyond the early career stages, they admit)
Science and forecasting practice are the foundations of the HEPEX community. These are certainly the routine of many of us during our office hours and while spending time in front of your computers.
But this community is also based on individuals, and this is often what really makes it fun to go to meetings, workshops and conferences. Face-to-face interactions often bring new ideas into form (see also this previous post from CSIRO team), while also helping us to further develop interpersonal skills.
There are two events for young hydrologists attending the HydroEco2017 (6th International Multidisciplinary Conference on: Hydrology and Ecology) next week in Birmingham:
**** HydroEco Drinks
**** Gallery Walk
For more information please feel free to contact Andrea Popp (email@example.com) or Kevin Roche (firstname.lastname@example.org). Looking forward to meeting you at HydroEco2017!
During the upcoming IAHS from 10 – 14 July, there will be a special program for Early Career Scientists*. Although these sessions are organized by and for Early Career Scientists, they are open to everyone. The sessions aim to (1) bring together peers in an informal environment, (2) improve scientific skills such as writing, (3) stimulate scientific discussion with peers and experienced scientists, and (4) contribute to building a global community of Early Career hydrologists
1. Sun 9 July 15:00 – 17:00 | Early Career Scientist Meeting
Program with informal and scientific parts. Highlight is the Meet the Expert session, during which three experts will share their visions on “Predictions under change in ungauged basins”. After 10-15 min presentations, the floor will be opened for an interactive discussion.
Confirmed speakers: Hubert Savenije, Berit Arheimer, Thomas Skaugen
2. Mon 10 Jul 17:45 – 19:00 | How to write a paper, and get it published
This short course will shortly recall some basic aspects of paper writing (in terms e.g. of content, form and readership) and give practical tips of how to get started, how to respond to reviewers’ comments, how to “negotiate” the author list, and how to select a journal.
Confirmed speakers: Dominic Mazvimavi, Graham Jewitt
3. Mon 10 Jul 19:00 – ..:.. | Early Career Drinks & Dinner
After the Short Course, Early Career scientists can join for (non-sponsored) drinks and dinner at Blue Waters Cafe.
4. Wed 12 July 12:40 – 13:40 | Creating Community for Early Career Hydrologists
This meeting will be open to representatives of early career networks, early career leaders, and anyone who is interested in contributing or participating in creating a community for young scientists. Participants will share examples of existing early career networks and leadership activities, and brainstorm about potential improvements for the (near) future.
All sessions are free of charge. Registration is appreciated (can be for each session separately, or all at once), to make sure all practical arrangements are made. To register, please send an email to email@example.com.
We look forward meeting you in Port Elizabeth!
Research “Hylight”: Estimating how spatial heterogeneity and lateral moisture redistribution affect average evapotranspiration by Elham Rouholahnejad Freund
This year, Elham Rouholahnejad Freund published a paper on how spatial heterogeneity and lateral moisture redistribution affect average evapotranspiration rates. We decided to ask her a couple of questions.
Q: Where are you from, where are you based, and what are your research interests?
I grew up in Iran, Isfahan and moved to Switzerland in 2009 to do a PhD at ETH Zurich. I am a Civil Engineer by background and studied Environmental Engineering and Environmental Science in my Master and PhD program. I finished my PhD at ETH Zurich in 2014 and did a postdoc at the department of Environmental Systems Science at ETH. I had been awarded a 2-year mobility grant by Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) to pursue my research in groundwater- soil moisture- atmosphere interactions. I am currently in Gent University and will move to Princeton for the second half of my scholarship.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Wouter Knoben, Shaun Harrigan, David Wright, Wouter Berghuijs
Scaling (i.e. the transfer of knowledge across scales) and scale issues (i.e. the associated problems) are at the heart of most hydrologic puzzles. In the most recent “Meet the Expert in Hydrology” session, organized at the EGU General Assembly 2017 in Vienna, YHS invited three speakers to identify to what degree their research is connected, influenced by, and influencing research at other spatial scales. By evaluating the current state of research and discussing future directions we tried to shed some new light on the question “Is hydrological research at different spatial scales connected?”. This is what we learned…
by Anna Solcerova (Delft University of Technology, convener)
Young (and mature) scientist visiting the EGU 2017 conference had a chance to participate on a short course titled “Opinion papers in hydrology: Why and how”. Bettina Schaefli, Vazken Andréassian, and Hubert Savenije shared their experience and opinions on this topic. Participants of this course could enjoy insights into pros and cons of opinion papers, as well as personal advice of the speakers. Bettina suggested to base an opinion on a quantifiable message, while Huub believes that opinion paper should be personal and controversial. Vazken discussed the use of humour in opinion papers and emphasised the readability. Two things all speakers agreed on was that one should write only few opinion papers, and that good opinion needs “time to settle in” (just like pancake batter).
Find their presentations here:
“Using R in hydrology” short course at EGU 2017 was a great success, attracting over 100 participants (in a room with 80 seats, see photo!). We covered a wide range of hydrologically focused applications of the R programming language: reproducible documents with rmarkdown, Using R as a GIS, Hydrological modelling with airGR, as well as Visualisation, Extreme value statistics and Trend analysis of discharge time-series. The slides with all the code and example datasets are available here.
It is time for the annual YHS Hydrodrinks event again!
On Wednesday 26 March YHS invites all young hydrologists (and everyone that feels young and/or hydrologist) to have dinner and drinks with us.
Ross Woods (University of Bristol) taught this year’s How to write a paper short course, focussing on “How to get your hydrology paper published – dealing with editors, reviews, and revisions”. The slides of the short course are available online.
On our website, you can also find the slides of previous versions of How to write a paper.
Research “Hylight”: CO2‐vegetation feedbacks and other climate changes implicated in reducing base flow by Ralph Trancoso et al.
Recently, Ralph Trancoso and colleagues published a paper on CO2‐vegetation feedbacks and river flow. We decided to ask him a couple of questions.
Q: Where are you from, where are you based, and what are your current research interests?
A: I am from Brazil, and have moved to Brisbane in Australia, about four years ago, to undertake my PhD at the University of Queensland. Having finished PhD a couple of months ago, I am now working for the Queensland government. My current main research focus is catchment ecohydrology. By integrating hydrology, remote sensing and ecosystem sciences, I explore the spatio-temporal variability of catchments biophysical properties to generate new insights into their hydrological functioning and changes. I compare the water and energy exchanges of many catchments spanning large extents to investigate large-scale ecohydrological patterns. Continue reading
Research “Hylight”: The global distribution and dynamics of surface soil moisture by Kaighin McColl et al.
This year, Kaighin McColl published a paper on global distribution and dynamics of surface soil moisture, based on NASA’s SMAP satellite. We decided to ask him a couple of questions about him and his research.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Andrea Popp.
A scientific poster is a visual communication tool summarizing your work and encouraging conversation with colleagues. However, posters are often poorly designed, e.g., they are densely packed and overloaded with text. This makes it difficult and tiring for the audience to understand the content. The following list provides 10 guidelines for an awesome poster to help you to communicate your work efficiently. We spiced this blog with insider tips from recent EGU and AGU Outstanding Student Poster Award winners (Skuyler Herzog, Ingo Heidbüchel, and Michael Stölzle).
Registration is now open for the 2017 Gordon Research Conference (GRC) and the 2017 Gordon Research Seminar (GRS) on Catchment Science: Interactions of Hydrology, Biology & Geochemistry. The theme of this GRC is “Crossing Boundaries and Seeking Synthesis in the Catchment Sciences.” The GRS will take place from June 25-30, 2017 at Bates College, Lewiston, ME and will be chaired by Jakob Schelker and Kevin McGuire.
For more up-to-date information on times and places for these events, please visit https://www.grc.org/programs.aspx?id=12331 or contact Inge Wiekenkamp (firstname.lastname@example.org) or Robert Sabo (Sabo.Robert@epa.gov ).
The position of European Geosciences Union (EGU) Early Career Scientist (ECS) representative for the Hydrological Sciences (HS) division is now open and seeking applications for the next 2 year term (April 2017-April 2019).
Please find details and how to apply here.
Please see the the EGU ECS page for eligibility.
Deadline: 10th March 2017
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Yvonne Smit.
As a kid imagining a scientist, we always thought of a professor with messy grey hair, weird glasses, handling all sorts of flasks with chemicals in it (including an explosion once in a while). In our mind those chemicals were magic potions to make someone happy or (in case of the Evil Queen from Snow White) to kill somebody. Not exactly what a scientist is or does, right? Other type of scientists we could think of as a kid were the ones that invented stuff like robots, electric wings (that you could tie on your back and would make you fly), etc. The latter idea might be representing reality a tiny bit more, but most of the scientists are not like these nutty professors or dodgy inventors at all. Soon enough, you’d find out that you do not really know what it means to be a scientist, so why become one? What appeals more to the imagination are doctors, lawyers, teachers, and firemen. So my question nowadays is: how do we stimulate children to go into science? Or, formulated in a different way: how do we stimulate parents to motivate their children to go into science? Let us begin by communicating about the things we do as a scientist and create awareness! After all, we are all trying to make the earth a better place to live on. This can be done as a scientist or by anyone who is interested in science and would like to make his or her own contribution to the world. Therefore it is important to show how science is done, what its use is and how cool it can be. However, scientific articles might not be the most appealing way to deliver the message. Perhaps an informal blog or a short science video is more effective? Continue reading
Last year, Louise Slater published a paper on recent trends in U.S. flood risk in Geophysical Research Letters. The paper uses an interesting new approach to quantify changes in flood risk. We decided to ask Louise a few questions about the paper.
A –Streams of Thought– contribution by Matthew Morison.
A little background: recently, the Canadian branch of the Young Hydrologic Society was formally recognized as a committee of the Canadian Geophysical Union Hydrology Section. As an international member of the diverse global YHS community, we are so excited to be apart the next generation of hydrological research and to have new links to so many different regions and countries! In this spirit, this article strives to shed some light on some research which is not uniquely Canadian (in fact, far from it), but remains a large research focus in Canada – permafrost hydrology.
Fantastic opportunity with three PhD openings at the Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien) focusing on the following topics:
Anyone interested can find more here: Details of PhD Positions at TU Wien
Deadline: 1st March 2017